I maintain

high
professional
standards.

Trustworthiness.
Responsibility.
Confidentiality.

The legal analyses and comparative legal analyses conducted by

Dr. Elizabeth Sushko-West

The list of some topics:

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 创新时代“一带一路”背景下的《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》.

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 创新时代“一带一路”背景下的《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》1 . 2022年浙江省法学会国际经济法学研究会年会暨“制度型开放背景下国 际经济法的创新发展”专题研讨会. 58-63.

“摘要:本文概述了“一带一路”倡议在创新时代可能面临的新挑战,例如跨法律文化问题,如果各方对相对应的国家的法律环境存在成见和误解,就无法达成协议,从而造成障碍。本论文以中国和英国作为“相对应的国家”的例子。通过对《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》和《2018年英国数据保护法》的分析,可以看出,这些法律在规范个人数据保护方面有着共同的方法。巩固互联互通与合作的基础是“一带一路”倡议的支柱之一。”2



1"The Law on Personal Information Protection of the People's Republic of China in the Context of the 'One-Belt-One-Road' in the Era of Innovation"

2 "Abstract: This paper outlines the new challenges that the 'One-Belt-One-Road' initiative may face in the innovation era, such as cross-cultural legal issues. If all parties have prejudices and misunderstanding about legal environment of the corresponding country, they will not be able to reach an agreement, which will create obstacles towards cooperation. This paper takes China and United Kingdom as examples of 'corresponding countries'. Through the analysis of the Law on Personal Information Protection of the People's Republic of China and the UK Data Protection Law 2018, it can be seen that these laws have a common approach in regulating personal data protection. Consolidating the foundation of connectivity and cooperation is one of the pillars of the ‘One-Belt-One-Road’ initiative."

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 创新对新时代公司模式和公司管理的影响.

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 创新对新时代公司模式和公司管理的影响. 新时代经济管理创新研究.

这篇手稿密切关注商业世界中使用的关于创新的常见类型以及被认为是同义词的词语。它试图说明这些差异,以及为什么我们不应该混淆和随意使用同义词来取代“创新”一词。伊丽莎白讨论商业策略、战略和计划,以及创新如何在确保公司成功方面发挥重要作用 (按照英国创新公司的经验;结合创新英国公司的经验)。伊丽莎白讨论了创新和发明之间的区别,并展示了创新和创造力之间的关系,公司可以将它们结合起来,建立强大的员工团队、战略和计划,将公司提升到新的水平等。

伊丽莎白讨论了各种商业模式,并建议公司如何使用创新的公司模式,以确保员工队伍更具凝聚力,产品跟上时尚和技术,并形成一家可以被视为“世界级”的公司。

Dr. Sushko-West, E. (2022). Facilitating negotiations between Chinese companies and companies in other countries (the UK): Using the example of the comparative legal analysis of the Law of the People's Republic of China “On the protection of personal information” to the UK DPA 2018/UK GDPR /ICO Guidance/PECR.

Dr. Sushko-West, E. (2022). Facilitating negotiations between Chinese companies and companies in other countries (the UK): Using the example of the comparative legal analysis of the Law of the People's Republic of China “On the protection of personal information” to the UK DPA 2018/UK GDPR /ICO Guidance/PECR

(Accepted and applied by interested parties)

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 促进中国公司与各个国家(英国)的公司 之间的谈判:以《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》与《2018年英国数据保护法》、英国通用数据保护条例、英国信息专员办公室指导、隐私和电子通信法规的比较法律分析为例.

伊丽莎白·苏什科·维斯特. (2022). 促进中英公司之间的谈判:以《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》与《2018年英国数据保护法》、英国通用数据保护条例、英国信息专员办公室指导、隐私和电子通信法规的比较法律分析为例.

(Accepted and applied by interested parties)

Dr. Sushko-West, E. (2021). Facilitating cooperation and commercial ties between the UK and China through supporting understanding between companies in these countries in the new era of innovation: A comparative legal analysis of the respective sources.

Dr. Sushko-West, E. (2021). Facilitating cooperation and commercial ties between the UK and China through supporting understanding between companies in these countries in the new era of innovation: A comparative legal analysis of the respective sources. 

(Accepted and applied by interested parties)

伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2021). 中国现代企业研究.

伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2021). 中国现代企业研究. 经济技术协作信息,No.28, 55-56.

伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2020). 欧盟新《通用数据保护条例》的规定:关键术语的研究.

摘要:《通用数据保护条例》对欧盟和欧洲经济有着直接的影响。通用数据保护条例的基于以下多个重要法律术语。法律术语是指具有法律性质或专门法律意义的概念。本文着重探析了欧盟成员国或欧洲经济区成员国的互连。本文探讨了《通用数据保护条例》的关键术语和基本法律工具。            

关键词:欧盟成员国;欧洲经济区成员国;适当的保障措施

伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2020). 欧盟新《通用数据保护条例》的规定:关键术语的研究. 经济与社会发展研究, No.29, 223-224.

Dr. Sushko, E. (2018). One Belt, One Road Initiative: Challenges and International Legal Aspects.
Dr. Sushko, E. (2018)."One Belt, One Road: Challenges and International Legal Aspects". A Keynote speech at the 3rd International Conference on Economics, Finance and Management Science. May 27-29, 2018. Hangzhou, China.
伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2016). 关于公司治理结构:比较法律分析.
伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2016). 关于公司治理结构:比较法律分析. 法制与社会,No. 6, 199-200.
伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2016). 资投实体: 比较法律分析.

伊丽莎白·苏什科. (2016). 资投实体: 比较法律分析 (C). //2016国际城市低影响开发(LID)学术大会论文集. 2016: 98-99.

Sushko, E. (2016). On the models of joint stock companies: a comparative legal analysis.

Sushko, E. (2016). On the models of joint stock companies: a comparative legal analysis. Eurasian Academic Research Journal, No. 3 (03), 78-84. 

Sushko, E. (2012). Development of the institute of legal persons in China.
Sushko, E. (2012). Development of the institute of legal persons in China. European Perspectives: Scientific Practical Journal, No. 4-2, 169-172.
Sushko, E. (2012). Concept of “Piercing of the Corporate Veil” in Germany.
Sushko, E.  (2012). Concept of “Piercing of the Corporate Veil” in Germany. In: Strategic Directions of the Legal System Development, 88-90.
Sushko, E. (2011). Sources of Civil Law in the People’s Republic of China and the Federal Republic of Germany.
Sushko, E. (2011). Sources of Civil Law in the People’s Republic of China and the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Theory and Practice of Effective National Legislation in the Modern Context, Vol. 3, 76.
Sushko, E. (2011). Legal personality under Chinese and German Civil Laws.
Sushko, E. (2011). Legal personality under Chinese and German Civil Laws. In: Modern reality, Vol. 2, 22-23.